In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance discuss the pair of conflicting court orders issued by federal judges in Texas and Washington state that have put access to the abortion drug Mifepristone in limbo.
In the full episode, Preet and Joyce break down:
- Issues stemming from former President Trump’s indictment in Manhattan, including whether prosecutors should have named the particular crime they allege Trump intended to conceal by falsifying business records, and whether prosecutors have the evidence to show the requisite intent to defraud under NY law;
- Whether Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas should have disclosed luxury trips and other hospitality he and his wife received from his friend, a billionaire GOP donor, as reported by ProPublica.
Stay informed. For analysis of the most important legal and political issues of our time, become a member of CAFE Insider for one month for $1.00: www.cafe.com/insider. You’ll get access to full episodes of the podcast, and other exclusive benefits.
Follow Up Against The Mob and listen to new episodes each Wednesday.
This podcast is brought to you by CAFE Studios and Vox Media Podcast Network.
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio Producer
Check out other CAFE podcasts: Now & Then, Up Against The Mob
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas Amarillo Division, memorandum opinion and order, 4/7/23
State of Washington et al. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., U.S. District Court Eastern District of Washington, order granting in part plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, 4/7/23