• Show Notes
  • Transcript

Earlier this week, a Manhattan jury found ex-Marine Daniel Penny not guilty of manslaughter for the killing of Jordan Neely, a homeless man, on a subway cart. Defense attorney & CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman joins Elie Honig to break down the charges, verdict, and how issues like racism, poverty, and mental health came into play in the so-called “subway chokehold” trial.

This is the latest installment of a new special series of episodes exclusively for members of CAFE Insider. Each week, Elie Honig and special guests will tackle one major legal or policy issue, helping you stay informed. Let us know what you think. Write to us at letters@cafe.com

This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. 

Executive Producer: Tamara Sepper; Editorial Producer II: Jake Kaplan; Associate Producer: Claudia Hernández; Audio Producer: Nat Weiner; Deputy Editor: Celine Rohr; CAFE Team: David Tatasciore, Matthew Billy, Noa Azulai, and Liana Greenway.

Elie Honig:

From CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast network. Welcome to CAFE Insider. I’m Elie Honig. Now, this week we’re diving into the controversial subway chokehold case in New York City, in which former Marine Daniel Penny was accused of killing Jordan Neely, a homeless man by putting him in a chokehold. On Monday, the jury found Penny not guilty of negligent homicide, the lower charge in the case after dismissing a more serious charge of manslaughter.

And joining me today to discuss this trial is Rikki Klieman. Rikki is a former prosecutor and a current criminal defense attorney. She’s also a legal analyst for CBS News, and what a thrill to have you here, Rikki. Thanks for joining.

Rikki Klieman: